I'm a school psych person, in case that matters (are there other school psych people applying for APPIC here?), and I'm really into the Kennedy Krieger Institute. They ask for one piece of supplementary material. I was planning on sending in a psych eval, but I just realized that I don't have any psych evals that include both IQ tests, ed assessments and behavior observations. The eval I was going to send includes the BASC, but otherwise its a pretty standard evaluation. I do have ADHD evaluations that include rating scales, systematic observations and naturalistic observations. Do you think it would be better to send a more general eval or an ADHD specific evaluation?
I am not school psych, but I have had a few sites that I had to contact regarding which eval to submit/which eval they'd prefer. So, given that it's just the one site, I would recommend contacting them to see if they have a preference. I emailed like 10 of my sites with questions, and every single one responded back (most within 2 days) and were all very helpful and kind.
If for any reason you don't want to do this, most of the sites I contacted told me to submit whichever report I felt was stronger or whichever report I felt best represented my experience. I think it is less about what tests were included, and more how you write and integrate all the results. Just my take.
PS, Thanks for your response AcronymAllergy! I didn't realize a case summary could be an eval. I guess I was thinking of just a snapshot of treatment with a patient. brief history, presenting complaint, treatment plan, treatment, termination. Good to know that it seems like I can be flexible with this! I wish sites would just say explicitly what they wanted.